Preparation workspace. These tools support expert discussion and consensus building. They do not by themselves constitute an approved or issued MPEG Call for Proposals.
Use cases analysed22
Candidate content entries—
Experts voting—
Valid expert votes—
⌘
Use Cases & Test Categories
Explore how GSC use cases map to fidelity requirements, coding configurations, content characteristics and candidate CfP test categories. Experts can compare reference scenarios and build alternative mappings.
Open Use-Case Analysis✓
Candidate Test Content
Review the proposed sequences, technical characteristics, readiness information and material submitted for the GSC CfP preparation.
Review Candidate Content★
Content Voting Results
Explore the final expert-based ranking of the proposed content, including average scores, vote distributions, support, neutrality, rejection and participation.
Open Content Voting ResultsCfP preparation status
| Activity | Status | Workspace / next step |
|---|---|---|
| Use cases & requirements | Active | Use-case analysis and expert scenarios |
| Test categories | Active | Derive and converge on CfP categories |
| Candidate content | Voting closed | Expert ranking and voting results available |
| Test conditions | In preparation | Rate points, coding conditions and category-specific rules |
| Anchors | In preparation | Reference software, reproducibility and cross-checks |
| Subjective evaluation | In preparation | Pose traces, sequence selection and test methodology |
| Draft CfP | In preparation | Integrate agreed material into the common draft |
Navigation